GOD WHO SAW ME: Faith and Dehumanization of Exegesis Studies Genesis 16
Abstract
The story of Abram and Sarah is an interesting story to discuss. Chaotic household trips due to the issue of Sarah's infertility became a crucial problem that saddened both of them. In the ancient world, Sarah's barrenness was not only considered a disgrace in the family, but also a serious problem for Abram as a man who would have no heir. Impatience awaits offspring, and Sarah's suggestion for Abram to take Hagar turns out to be a domestic conflict and oppression of Hagar, the servant. But God's grace did not only apply to Abram and Sarah but also to Hagar.
Downloads
References
Apriliandra, Sarah dan Hetty Krisnani. "Perilaku Diskriminatif Pada Perempuan Akibat Kuatnya Budaya Patriarki Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Konflik." Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik 3, no.1 (2021): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v3i1.31968
Boice, James Montgomery. Genesis: An Expositional Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1998.
Claassens, Juliana. “Just emotions: Reading the Sarah and Hagar narrative (Genesis 16, 21) through the lens of human dignity.” Verbum et Ecclesia, 34, no.2 (2013): 1-6. http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2074-77052013000200005&lng=en&tlng=en.
Clarke, Adam. Clarke's Commentary: Genesis. (Logos Library System: Clarke's Commentaries). Albany: Ages Software, 1999.
Gordon, J. Wenham. Word Biblical Commentary: Genesis 16-50. Dallas: Word, 2002.
Henry, Matthew. Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible: Complete and Unabridged in One Volume. Peabody: Hendrickson, 1996.
Jeansonne, Sharon Pace. The women of Genesis: From Sarah to Potiphar's wife, Minneapolis, MN.: Fortress Press, 1990.
Mathews, K. A. Genesis 11:27-50:26. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2007.
Mills, Mary. “The Story of Abram and Models of Human Identity.” New Blackfriars 89, no. 1021 (2008): 280–99. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43251230.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840715.
Sarna, Nahum M. Genesis. (The JPS Torah Commentary). Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989.
Sakenfeld, Khaterine D. Just wives: Stories of power and survival in the Old Testament and today, Louisville, KY.: Westminster John Knox, 2003.
Skinner, John. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Genesis. New York: Scribner, 1910.
Rokhimah, Siti. " Patriarkhisme Dan Ketidakadilan Gender" MUWAZAH: Jurnal Kajian Gender 6, no.1 (27 August 2015): 132-145. http://e-journal.iainpekalongan.ac.id/index.php/Muwazah/article/view/440.
Trible, Phyllis, “Hagar: The desolation of rejection,” in P. Trible, Texts of terror: Literary-feminist readings of biblical narratives, Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1984, 9-36.
Zucker, David J. dan Moshe Reiss. "Abram, Sarah, and Hagar as a Blended Family: Problems, Partings, and Possibilities." Women in Judaism: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 no.2 (Winter 2009): 1-18. https://wjudaism.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/wjudaism/article/view/12643.
Copyright (c) 2022 Chandra Wahyuni Irawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).










