Pedagogi Guru Matematika Melalui Teknologi

Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis

  • Zakaria Yusak Tadung Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Widya Agape
  • Juli Santoso Great Commission Theological Seminary
Keywords: pendidikan matematika, pedagogi guru, slr, teknologi

Abstract

Pedagogi Guru pada pelajaran Matematika merupakan bagian integral dari mediasi pembelajaran di kelas melalui teknologi. Artikel ini menjelaskan analisis literatur logis yang menyelidiki MTP. SLR membuat temuan dari studi penelitian MTP saat ini dengan intervensi teknologi dan studi sebelumnya yang digunakan dalam pendidikan untuk MTP dengan GeoGebra. Penilaian kualitas makalah dilakukan melalui pemurnian dokumen berulang dan dikeluarkan dari analisis. Dua puluh delapan publikasi memenuhi kriteria penyempurnaan dan inklusi atau eksklusi dari 110 makalah. Kerangka PRISMA yang dimodifikasi mencontohkan tinjauan pustaka yang sesuai. Hasilnya mengungkapkan bahwa intervensi MATLAB, IWB, WxMaxima, CAS, TIK, materi konkret, dan sumber daya lainnya dalam mengembangkan kinerja siswa dalam matematika secara umum efektif. Penulis menyelesaikan, mengamati, dan mendiskusikan tujuan tinjauan, beberapa batasan, dan arah masa depan untuk MTP dengan TPACK dan GG.

 

Author Biography

Juli Santoso, Great Commission Theological Seminary

 

 

References

Abidin, Mardhiyana, Zaleha Ismail, and Norulhuda Ismail. “Geometrical Thinking with Technology: A Systematic Literature Review.” Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEED 2018, 2019, 230–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2018.8626949.

———. “Geometrical Thinking with Technology: A Systematic Literature Review.” Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 10th International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEED 2018, no. November (2019): 230–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEED.2018.8626949.

Aizikovitsh, Einav, and Nenad Radakovic. “Teaching Probability by Using Geogebra Dynamic Tool and Implemanting Critical Thinking Skills.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 4943–47.

Akkaya, Recai. “Research on the Development of Middle School Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions Regarding the Use of Technology in Teaching Mathematics.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 12, no. 4 (2016): 861–79. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1257a.

Al-Abdullatif, Ahlam Mohammed, and Maha Saad Alsaeed. “Evaluating Visible Learning: Mathematics Teachers’ Practices in Technology-Enhanced Classrooms.” Cogent Education 6, no. 1 (2019): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1686798.

Aliyev, Y. N. “Use of Dynamic Geometry Software in Teaching and Research.” 2011 5th International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technologies, AICT 2011, 2011, 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAICT.2011.6110920.

Ayub, Ahmad Fauzi Mohd, Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Kamariah Abu Bakar, and Su Luan Wong. “WxMaxima Computer Software as an Aid to the Study of Calculus by Students with Different Learning Approaches.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 64 (2012): 467–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.055.

Backfisch, Iris, Andreas Lachner, Christoff Hische, Frank Loose, and Katharina Scheiter. “Professional Knowledge or Motivation? Investigating the Role of Teachers’ Expertise on the Quality of Technology-Enhanced Lesson Plans.” Learning and Instruction 66, no. March 2019 (2020): 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300.

Bano, Muneera, Didar Zowghi, Matthew Kearney, Sandra Schuck, and Peter Aubusson. “Mobile Learning for Science and Mathematics School Education: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence.” Computers and Education 121, no. February (2018): 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.006.

Beauchamp, Gary, and Steve Kennewell. “Transition in Pedagogical Orchestration Using the Interactive Whiteboard.” Education and Information Technologies 18, no. 2 (2013): 179–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9230-z.

Bray, Aibhín, and Brendan Tangney. “Technology Usage in Mathematics Education Research – A Systematic Review of Recent Trends.” Computers and Education 114 (2017): 255–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004.

Cecelia Chinyere, Ogbonna. “Effects of Constructivist Instructional Approach on Senior Secondary School Students Achievement and Interest In Mathematics.” Thesis, 2016.

Chen, Yang Hsueh, and Syh Jong Jang. “Interrelationship between Stages of Concern and Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge: A Study on Taiwanese Senior High School in-Service Teachers.” Computers in Human Behavior 32 (2014): 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.011.

Costică, Lupu. “Methods of Demonstrating the Collinearity of Points in Space.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180, no. November 2014 (2015): 847–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.223.

Daoud, Rana, Louise Starkey, Elizabeth Eppel, Tho Doan Vo, and Allan Sylvester. “The Educational Value of Internet Use in the Home for School Children: A Systematic Review of Literature.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 0, no. 0 (2020): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1783402.

Figueira-Sampaio, Aleandra da Silva, Eliane Elias Ferreira dos Santos, Gilberto Arantes Carrijo, and Alexandre Cardoso. “Survey of Mathematics Practices with Concrete Materials Used in Brazilian Schools.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 (2013): 151–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.169.

İpek, Jale, Melih Karasu, Selcan Kayahan, Esma Çukurbaşi, and Erkan Yeşil. “Inspection of Techno-Pedagogical Educational Qualifications of Mathematics Teacher Candidates.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 141 (2014): 718–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.126.

Kaarakka, Terhi, Kirsi Helkala, Antti Valmari, and Marjukka Joutsenlahti. “Pedagogical Experiments with MathCheck in University Teaching.” Lumat 7, no. 3 (2019): 84–112. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.7.3.428.

Kalloo, Vani, Permanand Mohan, and Kinshuk. “An Investigative Process for Enhancing the Design of a Mathematics Learning Game.” Proceedings - IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2016, 2016, 117–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2016.20.

Khan, Nohman, and Muhammad Imran Qureshi. “A Systematic Literature Review on Online Medical Services in Malaysia.” International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering 16, no. 6 (2020): 107–18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i06.13573.

Khoza, Simon Bheki, and Audrey Thabile Biyela. “Decolonising Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge of First Year Mathematics Students.” Education and Information Technologies 25, no. 4 (2019): 2665–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10084-4.

Kivkovich, Nava. “A Tool for Solving Geometric Problems Using Mediated Mathematical Discourse (for Teachers and Pupils).” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 209, no. July (2015): 519–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.282.

Kurvinen, E, E Kaila, H Kajasilta, and M-j Laakso. “Teachers ’ Perceptions of Digital Learning Path in Mathematics , Languages and Programming,” 2019, 643–48.

Li, Yeping, Ke Wang, Yu Xiao, Jeffrey E. Froyd, and Sandra B. Nite. “Research and Trends in STEM Education: A Systematic Analysis of Publicly Funded Projects.” International Journal of STEM Education 7, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00213-8.

Luo, Licheng, Hai Zhang, Yanan Tao, Xu Yang, Baoshan Yan, and Yining Wang. “A Study on Characteristics of TPACK Structure for MOOC Teachers.” Proceedings - 6th International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology, EITT 2017 2018-March (2018): 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2017.10.

Marshall, Neil, Chantal Buteau, Daniel H. Jarvis, and Zsolt Lavicza. “Do Mathematicians Integrate Computer Algebra Systems in University Teaching? Comparing a Literature Review to an International Survey Study.” Computers and Education 58, no. 1 (2012): 423–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.020.

McCulloch, Allison W., Karen Hollebrands, Hollylynne Lee, Taylor Harrison, and Asli Mutlu. “Factors That Influence Secondary Mathematics Teachers’ Integration of Technology in Mathematics Lessons.” Computers and Education 123, no. April (2018): 26–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.008.

Mishra, Punya, Matthew J Koehler, and Danah Henriksen. “The Seven Trans-Disciplinary Habits of Mind: Extending the TPACK Framework Towards 21 St Century Learning.” Educational Technology 11, no. 2 (2011): 22–28.

Misrom, Noor Suhaily, Muhammad Sani Abdurrahman, Abdul Halim Abdullah, Sharifah Osman, Mohd Hilmi Hamzah, and Ahmad Fauzan. “Enhancing Students ’ Higher -Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) Through an Inductive Reasoning Strategy Using Geogebra.” International Journal of Eme 15, no. 3 (2020): 156–79.

Mudaly, Vimolan, and Tamryn Fletcher. “The Effectiveness of Geogebra When Teaching Linear Functions Using the IPad.” Problems of Education in the 21st Century 77, no. 1 (2019): 55–81. https://doi.org/10.33225/PEC/19.77.55.

Ogbonnaya, Ugorji Iheanachor, and Melody Mushipe. “The Efficacy of Geogebra-Assisted Instruction on Students’ Drawing and Interpretations of Linear Functions.” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 19, no. 9 (2020): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.9.1.

Özgün-Koca, S. Asli. “Prospective Teachers’ Views on the Use of Calculators with Computer Algebra System in Algebra Instruction.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 13, no. 1 (2010): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9126-z.

Pfeiffer, Cerenus. “A Study of the Development of Mathematical Knowledge in a Geogebra- Focused Learning Environment,” 2017.

Piper, Rory J. “How to Write a Systematic Literature Review: A Guide for Medical Students.” National AMR 1, no. 2 (2013): 1–8.

Radu, Iulian, Betsy McCarthy, and Yvonne Kao. “Discovering Educational Augmented Reality Math Applications by Prototyping with Elementary-School Teachers.” Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality 2016-July (2016): 271–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504758.

Saralar, Ipek, Mine Işiksal-Bostan, and Didem Akyüz. “The Evaluation of a Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher’s TPACK: A Case of 3D Shapes with GeoGebra.” International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education 25, no. 2 (2018): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1564/tme_v25.2.01.

Takači, Djurdjica, Gordana Stankov, and Ivana Milanovic. “Efficiency of Learning Environment Using GeoGebra When Calculus Contents Are Learned in Collaborative Groups.” Computers and Education 82 (2015): 421–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.002.

Usman, M. “Concept Mapping Instructional Strategy and Senior Secondary Students ’ Performances and Interest in Algebra in Bauchi State.” Abacus (Mathematics Education Series) Vol. 44, No 1, Aug. 2019 44, no. 1 (2019): 236–43.

Warner, Steve, and Abtar Kaur. “The Perceptions of Teachers and Students on a 21 St Century Mathematics Instructional Model” 12, no. 2 (2017): 193–215.

Yong, Su Ting, Peter Gates, Andy Chan, Chien Sing Lee, Reginamary Matthews, and Kung Ming Tiong. “Exploring the Feasibility of Computer Games in Mathematics Education.” HAVE 2019 - IEEE International Symposium on Haptic, Audio-Visual Environments and Games, Proceedings, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/HAVE.2019.8921018.

Young, Jamaal. “Technology-Enhanced Mathematics Instruction: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis of 30 Years of Research.” Educational Research Review 22 (2017): 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.001.

Za’ba, Nurhashimah, Zaleha Ismail, Abdul Halim Abdullah, Nurhashimah Za’ba, Zaleha Ismail, and Abdul Halim Abdullah. “Preparing Student Teachers to Teach Mathematics with GeoGebra.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 8, no. 5 A (2020): 29–33. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081904.

Zualkernan, Imran A. “Gender Differences in a Technology-Based Numeracy Intervention in a Developing Country.,” 2015.

Published
2023-01-02
How to Cite
Tadung, Z. Y., & Santoso, J. (2023). Pedagogi Guru Matematika Melalui Teknologi: Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis. SERVIRE: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat , 2(2), 175-200. https://doi.org/10.46362/servire.v2i2.128