Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Template SERVIRE: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (maksimal file yang di upload 3MB)


Judul Ditulis dengan format Sentence Case Dengan Font Cambria Ukuran 16 pt (maksimal 15 kata) Bahasa Indonesia dan Inggris secara terpisah

 “judul tidak harus sama dengan judul kegiatan/laporan pengabdian kepada masyarakat dan menonjolkan kata kunci”


Penulis pertama1, Penulis ke-dua2*, dst

1Afiliasi penulis pertama 

2Afiliasi penulis ke-dua

Email : email penulis pertama, email penulis ke dua dst

 *Corresponding author: penulis(contoh)



 Abstrak ditulis dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan Inggris secara terpisah dengan menggunakan huruf Times New Romans ukuran 10 pt, spasi 1, terdiri dari 150 – 200 kata dan spasi 1. 

Kata Kunciterdiri dari 3 – 5 kata/prase pendek, urut abjad, huruf kecil, dipisahkan dengan titik koma.


“dari pendahuluan sampai daftar pustaka spasi 1,15” 


Pendahuluan tanpa sub judul yang memuat latar belakang, hipotesis (jika ada), tujuan penelitian. Komposisi pendahuluan (10 – 15) % dari total halaman artikel.  



 Metode penelitian dengan komposisi 8 – 10 % dari total halaman artikel.  



Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dengan komposisi 50 – 60% dari total halaman artikel.  



Simpulan dengan komposisi 5 – 10% dari total halaman artikel.


REFERENSI (minimal 15 referensi dan spasi 1)

Anwar, H. Teori Vygotsky Tentang Pentingnya Strategi Belajar, 2008.  

Arends, R. Learning to Teach, Belajar untuk Mengajar. Edisi Ketujuh. Jilid Satu. (diterjemahkan oleh Soedjipto, Helly, P. dan Soedjipto, Sri, M.) Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.

Khabibah, Siti, Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Matematika dengan soal terbuka untuk meningkatkan kreatifitas siswa sekolah Dasar. Disertasi, Tidak di Publikasikan. Surabaya: Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 2006.

Nur, Mohamad. Gagasan Menyiapkan Lulusan yang Adaptif Terhadap Perubahan. Catatan diskusi di Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Unesa tanggal 10 September 2012, 2012.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan No 58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum 2013 Sekolah Menengah Pertama/ Madrasah Tsanawiyah. 

Rosana, Dadan. Menggagas Pendidikan IPA yang Baik Terkait Esensial 21st Century Skills. Makalah ini Disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA ke IV, di Surabaya, tanggal 15 Desember 2012.

Samani, Muchlas. Tiga Problem Mendasar Pendidikan di Indonesia. Makalah ini disampaikan pada Munas ISPI di Surabaya 6-7 Desember 2014 

Subekti, Hasan, Isnawati, Nur, Mohamad. Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA SD untuk Memberi Kemudahan Guru Mengajar dan Siswa Belajar IPA dan Keterampilan Berfikir. LPPM Unesa, 2012.



Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed SERVIRE is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Indonesia Christian Theologian Association (PTAKI), Jakarta Widya Agape School of Theology as publisher of SERVIRE takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the SERVIRE is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.